Influence of Post-radiation Ocular Surface Disorder on Ocular Surgery: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: Ocular surface disorder after ocular radiation therapy, even though commonly reported, is often overlooked. Any delay in diagnosis may lead to complications that threaten vision. The presented case highlights the clinical outcome of a severe post-radiation disorder of the ocular surface, the importance of intensive therapy, and the limitations of further surgical interventions. CASE PRESENTATION: A 34-year-old woman was referred for a second opinion due to a years-long history of pain and redness in her right eye (OD) after proton beam therapy for recurrent iris melanoma. The patient then developed post-radiation retinopathy with macula edema, secondary glaucoma, cataract, as well as a severe ocular surface disorder with corneal decompensation and band keratopathy. Several surgical treatments have been attempted, including phacoemulsification with IOL implantation and trabeculectomy with mitomycin C. Due to refractory glaucoma, Baerveldt glaucoma drainage was then necessary. Given the worsening clinical presentation of post-radiation ocular surface disorder with progressing band keratopathy, the possibility of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) was discussed. CONCLUSION: The continuous worsening of clinical symptoms of the disorder of the ocular surface after proton beam radiotherapy can be the result of a post-radiation syndrome. Gradual expansion of ischemia, vasculitis, and inflammatory mediators compresses the retinal tissue, leading to recurrent macular edema as well as to secondary glaucoma and corneal decompensation. Band keratopathy is occasionally noted and seems to result from severe post-radiation disorder of the ocular surface. However, PKP would typically be indicated in cases of corneal perforation, uncontrolled infectious keratitis, or for improving vision in the presence of corneal opacification, none of which applied to our patient. Furthermore, post-radiation keratopathy implies compromised corneal stromal lymphogenesis and angiogenesis, both of which are now considered essential conditions for allograft rejection. Moreover, a previously performed Baerveldt glaucoma drainage surgery can affect the survival rate of the endothelial cells of the recipient cornea. Therefore, a penetrating or endothelial keratoplasty should be viewed as a high-risk procedure. In this instance, the rigorous treatment of the severe ocular surface disorder was crucial. We managed our patient's complex situation by following the latest guidelines set by the Tear Film & Ocular Surface Society and aimed to alleviate the symptoms as effectively as possible. In conclusion, careful decision-making regarding surgical treatment options should be considered, taking into account the complexities and potential risks involved.

Adverse radiation effect versus tumor progression following stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: Implications of radiologic uncertainty.

BACKGROUND: Adverse radiation effect (ARE) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases is challenging to distinguish from tumor progression. This study characterizes the clinical implications of radiologic uncertainty (RU). METHODS: Cases reviewed retrospectively at a single-institutional, multi-disciplinary SRS Tumor Board between 2015-2022 for RU following SRS were identified. Treatment history, diagnostic or therapeutic interventions performed upon RU resolution, and development of neurologic deficits surrounding intervention were obtained from the medical record. Differences in lesion volume and maximum diameter at RU onset versus resolution were compared with paired t-tests. Median time from RU onset to resolution was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate associations between clinical characteristics and time to RU resolution were assessed with Cox proportional-hazards regression. RESULTS: Among 128 lesions with RU, 23.5% had undergone ≥ 2 courses of radiation. Median maximum diameter (20 vs. 16 mm, p < 0.001) and volume (2.7 vs. 1.5 cc, p < 0.001) were larger upon RU resolution versus onset. RU resolution took > 6 and > 12 months in 25% and 7% of cases, respectively. Higher total EQD2 prior to RU onset (HR = 0.45, p = 0.03) and use of MR perfusion (HR = 0.56, p = 0.001) correlated with shorter time to resolution; larger volume (HR = 1.05, p = 0.006) portended longer time to resolution. Most lesions (57%) were diagnosed as ARE. Most patients (58%) underwent an intervention upon RU resolution; of these, 38% developed a neurologic deficit surrounding intervention. CONCLUSIONS: RU resolution took > 6 months in > 25% of cases. RU may lead to suboptimal outcomes and symptom burden. Improved characterization of post-SRS RU is needed.

Radiation necrosis after radiation therapy treatment of brain metastases: A computational approach.

Metastasis is the process through which cancer cells break away from a primary tumor, travel through the blood or lymph system, and form new tumors in distant tissues. One of the preferred sites for metastatic dissemination is the brain, affecting more than 20% of all cancer patients. This figure is increasing steadily due to improvements in treatments of primary tumors. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options for patients with a small or moderate number of brain metastases (BMs). A frequent adverse event of SRS is radiation necrosis (RN), an inflammatory condition caused by late normal tissue cell death. A major diagnostic problem is that RNs are difficult to distinguish from BM recurrences, due to their similarities on standard magnetic resonance images (MRIs). However, this distinction is key to choosing the best therapeutic approach since RNs resolve often without further interventions, while relapsing BMs may require open brain surgery. Recent research has shown that RNs have a faster growth dynamics than recurrent BMs, providing a way to differentiate the two entities, but no mechanistic explanation has been provided for those observations. In this study, computational frameworks were developed based on mathematical models of increasing complexity, providing mechanistic explanations for the differential growth dynamics of BMs relapse versus RN events and explaining the observed clinical phenomenology. Simulated tumor relapses were found to have growth exponents substantially smaller than the group in which there was inflammation due to damage induced by SRS to normal brain tissue adjacent to the BMs, thus leading to RN. ROC curves with the synthetic data had an optimal threshold that maximized the sensitivity and specificity values for a growth exponent ß* = 1.05, very close to that observed in patient datasets.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Recurrent Glioblastoma and Radiation Necrosis: A Single-Surgeon Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term clinical outcomes among patients treated with laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for predicted recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS: Patients with rGBM treated by LITT by a single surgeon (2013-2020) were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and OS after LITT. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (33 men, 16 women; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 58.7 [12.5] years) were evaluated. Among patients with genetic data, 6 of 34 (18%) had IDH-1 R132 mutations, and 7 of 21 (33%) had MGMT methylation. Patients underwent LITT at a mean (SD) of 23.8 (23.8) months after original diagnosis. Twenty of 49 (40%) had previously undergone stereotactic radiosurgery, 37 (75%) had undergone intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and 49 (100%) had undergone chemotherapy. Patients had undergone a mean of 1.2 (0.7) previous resections before LITT. Mean preoperative enhancing and T2 FLAIR volumes were 13.1 (12.8) cm3 and 35.0 (32.8) cm3, respectively. Intraoperative biopsies confirmed rGBM in 31 patients (63%) and radiation necrosis in 18 patients (37%). Six perioperative complications occurred: 3 (6%) cases of worsening aphasia, 1 (2%) seizure, 1 (2%) epidural hematoma, and 1 (2%) intraparenchymal hemorrhage. For the rGBM group, median PFS was 2.0 (IQR, 4.0) months, median OS was 20.0 (IQR, 29.5) months, and median OS after LITT was 6.0 (IQR, 10.5) months. For the radiation necrosis group, median PFS was 4.0 (IQR, 4.5) months, median OS was 37.0 (IQR, 58.0) months, and median OS after LITT was 8.0 (IQR, 23.5) months. CONCLUSIONS: In a diverse rGBM cohort, LITT was associated with a short duration of posttreatment PFS.

Comparison of Urinary Diversion in Patients With Prostatic Fistula to Those with Localized Radiation Injury After Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare characteristics and outcomes in patients who had radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa) and underwent urinary diversion (UD) due to prostatic fistula (Fistula) vs localized radiation injury (Localized). METHODS: This study was a retrospective single-institution study. Exclusion criteria included follow-up <3 months, large pelvic tumor, and surgery for cancer control. The Fistula group included fistulization outside of the urinary tract (rectal, soft tissue, thigh, pubic symphysis, and extensive necrosis surrounding the prostate). The group Localized had a multitude of problems; however, all were confined to the urinary tract. Patient characteristics, perioperative variables, and outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients were included and had UD from 2009-2022. Median age and time from RT to UD were 73 (interquartile range (IQR) 67.9, 78.1) and 7.3 (IQR 3.2, 12.5) years. There were 29 (42%) and 40 (58%) patients in the Fistula and Localized groups. The Fistula group had a higher rate of abdominal/perineal approach (62.1% vs 12.5%, P <.001), a lower rate of right colon pouch (17.2% vs 40%, P = .043), and a longer operative time (515.7 vs 414.2 minutes, P = .017). Clavien-Dindo complications ≥3 were higher in the Fistula group (44.8% vs 20%, P = .027), including a higher rate of re-operation for recurrent pelvic abscess (37.9% vs 5%, P <.001). Survival for the cohort was 85.5% and did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients with prostate fistula after RT for PCa undergoing UD had longer, more complex operations, and higher rates of complications, notably post-operative pelvic abscesses, compared to men with localized RT injury. Long-term survival was comparable in both groups.

[Pelvic exenteration for late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury: a preliminary study].

Objective: To investigate the safety and efficacy of total pelvic exenteration (TPE) for treating late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury. Methods: This was a descriptive case series study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) confirmed radiation-induced pelvic injury after radiotherapy for pelvic malignancies; (2) late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury, such as bleeding, perforation, fistula, and obstruction, involving multiple pelvic organs; (3) TPE recommended by a multidisciplinary team; (4) patient in good preoperative condition and considered fit enough to tolerate TPE; and (5) patient extremely willing to undergo the procedure and accept the associated risks. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) preoperative or intraoperative diagnosis of tumor recurrence or metastasis; (2) had only undergone diversion or bypass surgery after laparoscopic exploration; and (3) incomplete medical records. Clinical and follow-up data of patients who had undergone TPE for late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury between March 2020 and September 2022 at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were analyzed. Perioperative recovery, postoperative complications, perioperative deaths, and quality of life 1 year postoperatively were recorded. Results: The study cohort comprised 14 women, nine of whom had recto-vagino-vesical fistulas, two vesicovaginal fistulas, one ileo-vesical fistula and rectal necrosis, one ileo-vesical and rectovaginal fistulas, and one rectal ulcer and bilateral ureteral stenosis. The mean duration of surgery was 592.1±167.6 minutes and the median blood loss 550 (100-6000) mL. Ten patients underwent intestinal reconstruction, and four the Hartmann procedure. Ten patients underwent urinary reconstruction using Bricker's procedure and 7 underwent pelvic floor reconstruction. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 23.6±14.9 days. Seven patients (7/14) had serious postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo IIIa to IVb), including surgical site infections in eight, abdominopelvic abscesses in five, pulmonary infections in five, intestinal obstruction in four, and urinary leakage in two. Empty pelvis syndrome (EPS) was diagnosed in five patients, none of whom had undergone pelvic floor reconstruction. Five of the seven patients who had not undergone pelvic floor reconstruction developed EPS, compared with none of those who had undergone pelvic floor reconstruction. One patient with EPS underwent reoperation because of a pelvic abscess, pelvic hemorrhage, and intestinal obstruction. There were no perioperative deaths. During 18.9±10.1 months of follow-up, three patients died, two of renal failure, which was a preoperative comorbidity, and one of COVID-19. The remaining patients had gradual and significant relief of symptoms during follow-up. QLQ-C30 assessment of postoperative quality of life showed gradual improvement in all functional domains and general health at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively (all P<0.05). Conclusions: TPE is a feasible procedure for treating late complications of radiation-induced pelvic injury combined with complex pelvic fistulas. TPE is effective in alleviating symptoms and improving quality of life. However, the indications for this procedure should be strictly controlled and the surgery carried out only by experienced surgeons.

Intraoperative appearance of radiation enteritis: What should be resected?

Radiation enteritis can appear up to 30 years after radiotherapy. Outside acute complications, it usually manifests itself as chronic intestinal obstruction. If medical treatment (corticosteroid therapy) fails, surgical treatment is indicated, namely resection of the affected bowel, with removal of the ileo-caecal valve.

Toxicity and outcomes of melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery: the risk of subsequent symptomatic intralesional hemorrhage exceeds that of radiation necrosis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the outcomes and patterns of toxicity in patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without immunotherapy (IO). METHODS: From a prospective registry, we reviewed MBM patients treated with single fraction Gamma Knife SRS between 2008 and 2021 at our center. We recorded all systemic therapies (chemotherapy, targeted therapy, or immunotherapy) administered before, during, or after SRS. Patients with prior brain surgery were excluded. We captured adverse events following SRS, including intralesional hemorrhage (IH), radiation necrosis (RN) and local failure (LF), as well as extracranial disease status. Distant brain failure (DBF), extracranial progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined using a cumulative Incidence function and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Our analysis included 165 patients with 570 SRS-treated MBM. Median OS for patients who received IO was 1.41 years versus 0.79 years in patients who did not (p = 0.04). Ipilimumab monotherapy was the most frequent IO regimen (30%). In the absence of IO, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic (grade 2 +) RN was 3% at 24 months and remained unchanged with respect to the type or timing of IO. The incidence of post-SRS g2 + IH in patients who did not receive systemic therapy was 19% at 1- and 2 years compared to 7% at 1- and 2 years among patients who did (HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-0.98; p = 0.046). Overall, neither timing nor type of IO correlated to rates of DBF, OS, or LF. Among patients treated with IO, the median time to extracranial PFS was 5.4 months (95% IC 3.2 - 9.1). CONCLUSION: The risk of g2 + IH exceeds that of g2 + RN in MBM patients undergoing SRS, with or without IO. IH should be considered a critical adverse event following MBM treatments.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Lung Oligo-metastases: Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines.

PURPOSE: A systematic review of treatment characteristics, outcomes, and treatment-related toxicities of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for pulmonary oligometastases served as the basis for development of this International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS) practice guideline. METHODS: In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was performed of retrospective series with ≥50 patients/lung metastases, prospective trials with ≥25 patients/lung metastases, analyses of specific high-risk situations, and all randomized trials published between 2012 and July 2022 in the MEDLINE or Embase database using the key words "lung oligometastases", "lung metastases", "pulmonary metastases", "pulmonary oligometastases", "stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)" and "stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SBRT)". Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled outcomes estimates. RESULTS: Of the 1884 articles screened, 35 analyses (27 retrospective-, 5 prospective, and 3 randomized trials) reporting on treatment of >3600 patients and >4650 metastases were included. The median local control was 90 % (Range: 57-100 %) at 1 year and 79 % (R: 70-96 %) at 5 years. Acute toxicity ≥3 was reported for 0.5 % and late toxicity ≥3 for 1.8 % of patients. A total of 21 practice recommendations covering the areas of staging & patient selection (n = 10), SBRT treatment (n = 10), and follow-up (n = 1) were developed, with agreements rates of 100 %, except for recommendation 13 (83 %). CONCLUSION: SBRT represents an effective definitive local treatment modality combining high local control rates with low risk of radiation-induced toxicities.

Volume Fractionation Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Large Volume Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations.

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are common intracranial vascular anomalies. Common treatment modalities used to manage AVMs are surgical excision, embolization, and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Large AVMs are defined as AVMs larger than 10 cm3 and pose a therapeutic challenge with high rates of treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Single-stage SRS is a good option for small AVMs but carries high risks of radiation-induced complications in large AVMs. Volume-staged SRS (VS-SRS) is a newer strategy used in large AVMs that allows one to deliver an optimal radiation dose to the AVMs while reducing the risk of radiation damage to the normal brain. It involves the division of AVM into multiple small sectors which are irradiated at different time intervals with high radiation doses. Good obliteration rates with less risk of radiation-induced complications have been described in the literature with VS-SRS.

[Clincal practice of pelvic exenteration for late complications of pelvic radiation injury].

Pelvic radiation injury can potentially involve multiple pelvic organs, and due to its progressive and irreversible nature, its late stage can be complicated by fistulas, perforations, obstructions and other complications involved multiple pelvic organs, which seriously affect the long-term survival and the quality of life of patients. As a multidisciplinary surgical approach, pelvic exenteration has potential application in the treatment of late complications of pelvic radiation injury by completely removing the irradiated lesion, relieving symptoms and avoiding recurrence of symptoms. In clinical practice, we should advocate the concept of "pelvic radiation injury", emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration, fully evaluate the overall status of patients, primary tumor and pelvic radiation injury. We should follow the principles of "damage-control" and "extended resection", and follow the principle of enhanced recovery after surgery to achieve the goal of ensuring the surgical safety, relieving patients' symptoms and improving patients' quality of life and long-term survival.

SAFESTEREO: phase II randomized trial to compare stereotactic radiosurgery with fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a frequently chosen treatment for patients with brain metastases and the number of long-term survivors is increasing. Brain necrosis (e.g. radionecrosis) is the most important long-term side effect of the treatment. Retrospective studies show a lower risk of radionecrosis and local tumor recurrence after fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS, e.g. five fractions) compared with stereotactic radiosurgery in one or three fractions. This is especially true for patients with large brain metastases. As such, the 2022 ASTRO guideline of radiotherapy for brain metastases recommends more research to fSRS to reduce the risk of radionecrosis. This multicenter prospective randomized study aims to determine whether the incidence of adverse local events (either local failure or radionecrosis) can be reduced using fSRS versus SRS in one or three fractions in patients with brain metastases. METHODS: Patients are eligible with one or more brain metastases from a solid primary tumor, age of 18 years or older, and a Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70. Exclusion criteria include patients with small cell lung cancer, germinoma or lymphoma, leptomeningeal metastases, a contraindication for MRI, prior inclusion in this study, prior surgery for brain metastases, prior radiotherapy for the same brain metastases (in-field re-irradiation). Participants will be randomized between SRS with a dose of 15-24 Gy in 1 or 3 fractions (standard arm) or fSRS 35 Gy in five fractions (experimental arm). The primary endpoint is the incidence of a local adverse event (local tumor failure or radionecrosis identified on MRI scans) at two years after treatment. Secondary endpoints are salvage treatment and the use of corticosteroids, bevacizumab, or antiepileptic drugs, survival, distant brain recurrences, toxicity, and quality of life. DISCUSSION: Currently, limiting the risk of adverse events such as radionecrosis is a major challenge in the treatment of brain metastases. fSRS potentially reduces this risk of radionecrosis and local tumor failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClincalTrials.gov, trial registration number: NCT05346367 , trial registration date: 26 April 2022.

Effectiveness of Surgical Excision Following Plutonium-contaminated Wounds: Inferences from Historical Cases.

ABSTRACT: As with any medical treatment, the decision to excise a wound contaminated with actinides is a risk-benefit analysis. The potential benefits of surgical excision following such contaminated wounds are reduction in the probability of stochastic effects, avoidance of local effects, and psychological comfort knowing that radioactive material deposited in the wound is prevented from being systemic. These benefits should be balanced against the potential risks such as pain, numbness, infection, and loss of function due to excision. To that end, the responsibility of an internal dosimetrist is to provide advice to both the patient and the treating physician about the likely benefits of excision that include, but not limited to, averted doses. This paper provides a review of the effectiveness of surgical excisions following plutonium-contaminated wounds and finds that excisions are highly effective at removing plutonium from wounds and at averting the doses they would have caused.

A Case of Radiation-Induced Osteosarcoma with RB1 Gene Alteration Treated by Skull Base Surgery and Craniofacial Reconstruction.

A 35-year-old female presented with headache, photophobia and developed sudden loss of vision after having undergone right-side ophthalmectomy and radiochemotherapy for retinoblastoma in infancy. A neoplastic lesion was found in the left middle cranial fossa and was surgically removed. The diagnosis was radiation-induced osteosarcoma with RB1 gene alteration. Although she received chemotherapy for the residual tumor, it progressed 17 months later. Maximal surgical resection with craniofacial reconstruction was required. We utilized two three-dimensional models for surgical planning. She was discharged without neurological deficits other than loss of light perception subsequent to left ophthalmectomy. In cases where retinoblastoma is treated with radiotherapy, long-term follow-up is necessary to monitor for radiation-induced tumor development.

Buccal fat pad flap for transoral repair of radiation-induced necrosis in the lateral oropharyngeal wall.

Soft tissue necrosis (STN) is a late toxicity after radiotherapy. Extensive tissue defects due to STN near the carotid artery, such as in the lateral oropharyngeal wall, may lead to infectious pseudoaneurysms associated with fatal bleeding. Such defects are usually treated with transcervical reconstructive surgeries, which are highly invasive and technically difficult. We report a case in which a buccal fat pad (BFP) flap was used for minimally invasive transoral repair of tissue defects due to radiation-induced STN in the lateral oropharyngeal wall. The BFP flap covered the tissue defect, and the wound epithelialized completely. The patient had no dysfunctional mouth opening, speech, or swallowing. The BFP flap can be easily harvested via a minimally invasive transoral approach and is expected to be further utilized for radiation-induced STN in the lateral oropharyngeal wall.

Adverse radiation effect and freedom from progression following repeat stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases.

OBJECTIVE: The authors previously evaluated risk and time course of adverse radiation effects (AREs) following stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases, excluding lesions treated after prior SRS. In the present analysis they focus specifically on single-fraction salvage SRS to brain metastases previously treated with SRS or hypofractionated SRS (HFSRS), evaluating freedom from progression (FFP) and the risk and time course of AREs. METHODS: Brain metastases treated from September 1998 to May 2019 with single-fraction SRS after prior SRS or HFSRS were analyzed. Serial follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and surgical pathology reports were reviewed to score local treatment failure and AREs. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate FFP and risk of ARE measured from the date of repeat SRS with censoring at the last brain MRI. RESULTS: A total of 229 retreated brain metastases in 124 patients were evaluable. The most common primary cancers were breast, lung, and melanoma. The median interval from prior SRS/HFSRS to repeat SRS was 15.4 months, the median prescription dose was 18 Gy, and the median duration of follow-up imaging was 14.5 months. At 1 year after repeat SRS, FFP was 80% and the risk of symptomatic ARE was 11%. The 1-year risk of imaging changes, including asymptomatic RE and symptomatic ARE, was 30%. Among lesions that demonstrated RE, the median time to onset was 6.7 months (IQR 4.7-9.9 months) and the median time to peak imaging changes was 10.1 months (IQR 5.6-13.6 months). Lesion size by quadratic mean diameter (QMD) showed similar results for QMDs ranging from 0.75 to 2.0 cm (1-year FFP 82%, 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE 11%). For QMD < 0.75 cm, the 1-year FFP was 86% and the 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE was only 2%. Outcomes were worse for QMDs 2.01-3.0 cm (1-year FFP 65%, 1-year risk of symptomatic ARE 24%). The risk of symptomatic ARE was not increased with tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy before or after repeat SRS. CONCLUSIONS: RE on imaging was common after repeat SRS (30% at 1 year), but the risk of a symptomatic ARE was much less (11% at 1 year). The results of repeat single-fraction SRS were good for brain metastases ≤ 2 cm. The authors recommend an interval ≥ 6 months from prior SRS and a prescription dose ≥ 18 Gy. Alternatives such as HFSRS, laser interstitial thermal therapy, or resection with adjuvant radiation should be considered for recurrent brain metastases > 2 cm.

Chest wall reconstruction for deep radiation necrosis: case report and overview of surgical options.

INTRODUCTION: To report a case of radiation necrosis after reirradiation for breast cancer and the difficulties encountered when treating these complex cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We present an 86-year-old woman with a history of right-sided intraductal breast cancer treated with a right mastectomy followed by local adjuvant radiotherapy (50 Gray). Twelve years later, she was diagnosed with a local recurrence in the mastectomy scar which was treated with local resection (including resection of rib four) and adjuvant radiotherapy up to 32 Gray. In July 2020 she presents at the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery with a chronic ulcer on the right-sided hemithorax. RESULTS: A multi-staged, multidisciplinary approach was necessary to secure lasting coverage of the extensive defect. CONCLUSION: Thoracic radiation necrosis should be subject to a multidisciplinary approach (plastic and thoracic surgeons) pre-, per-, and post-operatively. Each case may require a different surgical approach depending on the size and depth of the defect, patients' age, comorbidities, and previous medical treatment.

Clincal practice of pelvic exenteration for late complications of pelvic radiation injury / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Pelvic radiation injury can potentially involve multiple pelvic organs, and due to its progressive and irreversible nature, its late stage can be complicated by fistulas, perforations, obstructions and other complications involved multiple pelvic organs, which seriously affect the long-term survival and the quality of life of patients. As a multidisciplinary surgical approach, pelvic exenteration has potential application in the treatment of late complications of pelvic radiation injury by completely removing the irradiated lesion, relieving symptoms and avoiding recurrence of symptoms. In clinical practice, we should advocate the concept of "pelvic radiation injury", emphasize multidisciplinary collaboration, fully evaluate the overall status of patients, primary tumor and pelvic radiation injury. We should follow the principles of "damage-control" and "extended resection", and follow the principle of enhanced recovery after surgery to achieve the goal of ensuring the surgical safety, relieving patients' symptoms and improving patients' quality of life and long-term survival.

Predicting post-radiation genitourinary hospital admissions in patients with localised prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The risk of treatment-related toxicity is important for patients with localised prostate cancer to consider when deciding between treatment options. We developed a model to predict hospitalisation for radiation-induced genitourinary toxicity based on patient characteristics. METHODS: The prospective South Australian Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes registry was used to identify men with localised prostate cancer who underwent curative intent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) between 1998 and 2019. Multivariable Cox proportional regression was performed. Model discrimination, calibration, internal validation and utility were assessed using C-statistics and area under ROC, calibration plots, bootstrapping, and decision curve analysis, respectively. RESULTS: There were 3,243 patients treated with EBRT included, of which 644 (20%) patients had a treated-related admission. In multivariable analysis, diabetes (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.60, p < 0.001), smoking (HR 1.78, 95% CI 1.40-2.12, p < 0.001), and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) without transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) (HR 7.49, 95% CI 6.18-9.08 p < 0.001) followed by BOO with TURP (HR 4.96, 95% CI 4.10-5.99 p < 0.001) were strong independent predictors of hospitalisation (censor-adjusted c-statistic = 0.80). The model was well-calibrated (AUC = 0.76). The global proportional hazards were met. In internal validation through bootstrapping, the model was reasonably discriminate at five (AUC 0.75) years after radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to develop a predictive model for genitourinary toxicity requiring hospitalisation amongst men with prostate cancer treated with EBRT. Patients with localised prostate cancer and concurrent BOO may benefit from TURP before EBRT.